Hans van der Meer schrieb am 20.03.19 um 18:20:
Last login: Wed Mar 20 08:23:38 on ttys000
Wed Mar 20 18:17:51 CET 2019
21 ~: cdg
22 Genealogie: contexjit family-note.tex
-bash: contexjit: command not found
23 Genealogie:
mmm... contextjit doesn't come with the beta install? Or do I miss
019, at 18:03, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
> Henning Hraban Ramm schrieb am 20.03.19 um 17:27:
>> With the latest beta, context --jit stopped working on my Mac (OSX 10.9.5):
>>
>>
>> This is LuajitTeX, Version 1.09.2 (TeX Live 2019/dev)
>> system comma
o the same call?
It shows the same version LuajitTeX 1.09.2
Greetlings, Hraban
---
https://www.fiee.net
http://wiki.contextgarden.net
https://www.dreiviertelhaus.de
GPG Key ID 1C9B22FD
___
If your question is of int
Henning Hraban Ramm schrieb am 20.03.19 um 17:27:
With the latest beta, context --jit stopped working on my Mac (OSX 10.9.5):
This is LuajitTeX, Version 1.09.2 (TeX Live 2019/dev)
system commands enabled.
---!
/Users/hraban/Library/texmf/tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache/context
With the latest beta, context --jit stopped working on my Mac (OSX 10.9.5):
This is LuajitTeX, Version 1.09.2 (TeX Live 2019/dev)
system commands enabled.
---!
/Users/hraban/Library/texmf/tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache/context/5fe67e0bfe781ce0dde776fb1556f32e/formats/luatex/cont-en.fmt
New release Luajittex beta-0.78.2, which follows luatex beta-0.78.2 .
From NEWS.luajittex:
This update is brought to you by the
crited project where we need a fast luatex / context combi in order to meet
our demands.
This version is optimized for typesetting critical editions with context
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Dear list,
could anyone using the latest beta from ConTeXt Suite in Linux 32-bit
confirm whether compilation with the option --engine=luajittex works?
Indeed the binary doesn't even work on the same machine where it has
been compiled
On 01/09/2014 01:37 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
I added Alan's binary now, but I currently don't have a suitable linux
box to test whether it works.
Many thanks for the replies and the help, Luigi, Alan and Mojca.
Everything works fine
On 01/07/2014 10:14 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/7/2014 9:58 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
Many thanks for your help, Mojca.
I tried and it seems that I still have the issue.
I will check tomorrow again.
or move to 64 bit linux (makes normal luatex faster too)
My processor and system
On 01/07/2014 08:36 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
[...]
Please try again. (Or at least I hope that the new binary has
proliferated to the distribution already.)
Mojca,
just now the ConTeXt Suite still downloads version 0.78.0 for Linux
32-bit (This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.78.0-2014010116 (TeX
On Jan 8, 2014 5:02 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/07/2014 08:36 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
[...]
Please try again. (Or at least I hope that the new binary has
proliferated to the distribution already.)
Mojca,
just now the ConTeXt Suite still downloads version 0.78.0 for Linux
On 01/08/2014 05:11 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Jan 8, 2014 5:02 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/07/2014 08:36 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
[...]
Please try again. (Or at least I hope that the new binary has
proliferated to the distribution already.)
Mojca,
just now the ConTeXt Suite
fails only when using LuajitTeX, not LuaTeX.
And keeping my format file from my previous install doesn’t avoid the
issue. It simply doesn’t compile the ConTeXt source, but I failed to
notice it.
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
Dear list,
could anyone using the latest beta from ConTeXt Suite in Linux 32-bit
confirm whether compilation with the option --engine=luajittex works?
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 20:47:53 +0100
Pablo Rodriguez oi...@gmx.es wrote:
Dear list,
could anyone using the latest beta from ConTeXt Suite in Linux 32-bit
confirm whether compilation with the option --engine=luajittex works?
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
I have recompiled all
On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex?
both should work although at some point we will move on to 0.77
specific functionality
there will be a luajittex 0.78.1 soon (there is already
On 1/7/2014 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex?
both should work although at some point we will move on to 0.77
specific functionality
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex?
both should work although at some point we will move on to 0.77
specific functionality
On 01/07/2014 07:24 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex?
both should work although at some point we will move
On 01/07/2014 07:17 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/7/2014 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
I have just updated the ConTeXt Suite (for Linux) and luajittex seems to
be broken. When removing tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache, context isn’t
able to recreate it.
If I try to recreate it manually (invoking
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/07/2014 07:24 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex
On 1/7/2014 8:04 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/07/2014 07:17 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/7/2014 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
I have just updated the ConTeXt Suite (for Linux) and luajittex seems to
be broken. When removing tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache, context isn’t
able to recreate
On 1/7/2014 8:06 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
I guess the version mismatch might cause the issue.
A mismatch between ... and ... ?
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 |
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/7/2014 8:06 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
I guess the version mismatch might cause the issue.
A mismatch between ... and ... ?
He was using luajittex 0.77.0 which is apparently too old already.
Mojca
On 01/07/2014 08:36 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
[...]
Please try again. (Or at least I hope that the new binary has
proliferated to the distribution already.)
Many thanks for your help, Mojca.
I tried and it seems that I still have the issue.
I will check tomorrow again.
Pablo
--
On 1/7/2014 9:58 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/07/2014 08:36 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
[...]
Please try again. (Or at least I hope that the new binary has
proliferated to the distribution already.)
Many thanks for your help, Mojca.
I tried and it seems that I still have the issue.
I will
Dear list,
first of all, best wishes to all for the new year 2014.
I have just updated the ConTeXt Suite and I discovered that the latest
luatex version is newer than the luajittex version (0.78.0 vs. 0.77.0).
Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex?
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Dear list,
first of all, best wishes to all for the new year 2014.
I have just updated the ConTeXt Suite and I discovered that the latest
luatex version is newer than the luajittex version (0.78.0 vs. 0.77.0).
Which one is preferable: luatex
Hi,
the following example compiles fine with LuaTeX, but LuajitTeX fails
to find the font.
\setupalign[r2l]
\definefont[Sheherazade][name:scheherazade*arabic at 18pt]
\starttext
\Sheherazade أهلا بالعالم!
\stoptext
fontsdefining font with asked name 'scheherazade' is not found
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Marco Patzer li...@homerow.info wrote:
Hi,
the following example compiles fine with LuaTeX, but LuajitTeX fails
to find the font.
\setupalign[r2l]
\definefont[Sheherazade][name:scheherazade*arabic at 18pt]
\starttext
\Sheherazade أهلا بالعالم
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, Marco Patzer wrote:
Hi,
the following example compiles fine with LuaTeX, but LuajitTeX fails
to find the font.
\setupalign[r2l]
\definefont[Sheherazade][name:scheherazade*arabic at 18pt]
\starttext
\Sheherazade أهلا بالعالم!
\stoptext
fontsdefining font
On 8/23/2013 11:14 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
Hi,
the following example compiles fine with LuaTeX, but LuajitTeX fails
to find the font.
\setupalign[r2l]
\definefont[Sheherazade][name:scheherazade*arabic at 18pt]
\starttext
\Sheherazade أهلا بالعالم!
\stoptext
fontsdefining font
On 2013–08–24 Hans Hagen wrote:
Hard to say what is the issue but it is not a luajittex issue. We
don't do anything special, for instance jit is turned off because
there is no gain at all (actually with jit enabled, the run is
slower).
I can confirm that. I did not find a real-world document
On 8/24/2013 2:25 AM, Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013–08–24 Hans Hagen wrote:
Hard to say what is the issue but it is not a luajittex issue. We
don't do anything special, for instance jit is turned off because
there is no gain at all (actually with jit enabled, the run is
slower).
I can confirm
On 18/06/13 23:35, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 6/18/2013 11:05 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
Dear list,
I wonder whether this would be interesting to the luajittex developers,
but for some strange reason when I invoke context with
--engine=luajittex, only some system fonts are found.
My guess
Dear list,
I wonder whether this would be interesting to the luajittex developers,
but for some strange reason when I invoke context with
--engine=luajittex, only some system fonts are found.
My guess is that with luajittext the most recently installed system
fonts aren't the ones not found
On 6/18/2013 11:05 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
Dear list,
I wonder whether this would be interesting to the luajittex developers,
but for some strange reason when I invoke context with
--engine=luajittex, only some system fonts are found.
My guess is that with luajittext the most recently
On 2013–05–07 Kip Warner wrote:
I find the \texenginename and \texengineversion useful for retrieving
the backend name and version. They work fine when using the vanilla
LuaTeX backend. However, when using LuaJitTeX, the aforementioned
macros still seem to retrieve LuaTeX specific information
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
Hey Luigi,
I find the \texenginename and \texengineversion useful for retrieving
the backend name and version. They work fine when using the vanilla
LuaTeX backend. However, when using LuaJitTeX, the aforementioned
macros
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:32 AM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, it's known and it's ok, because luajittex is not different from
luatex as luatex is different from pdftex/xetex/etex
(and if it's so, then it is an error).
(and if it's not so, then it is an error
On 5/8/2013 9:29 AM, Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013–05–07 Kip Warner wrote:
I find the \texenginename and \texengineversion useful for retrieving
the backend name and version. They work fine when using the vanilla
LuaTeX backend. However, when using LuaJitTeX, the aforementioned
macros still seem
backend. However, when using LuaJitTeX, the aforementioned
macros still seem to retrieve LuaTeX specific information and not
LuaJitTeX - unless I'm doing something wrong. I was careful to ensure I
passed --engine=luajittex to context as well.
--
Kip Warner -- Software Engineer
OpenPGP
Hey Luigi,
I find the \texenginename and \texengineversion useful for retrieving
the backend name and version. They work fine when using the vanilla
LuaTeX backend. However, when using LuaJitTeX, the aforementioned
macros still seem to retrieve LuaTeX specific information and not
LuaJitTeX
On 2013–04–03 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/3/2013 12:46 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
Hi,
the latest beta throws:
mtx-context | redirect texlua - luajittex: luajittex --luaonly
/tmp/luajitbug/newbeta/tex/texmf-linux-64/bin/mtxrun --script context
--jit t
--redirected/tmp/luajitbug/newbeta
On 4/4/2013 9:21 AM, Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013–04–03 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/3/2013 12:46 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
Hi,
the latest beta throws:
mtx-context | redirect texlua - luajittex: luajittex --luaonly
/tmp/luajitbug/newbeta/tex/texmf-linux-64/bin/mtxrun --script context --jit t
On 2013–04–04 Hans Hagen wrote:
Indeed, LuajitTeX works, but you broke MkII. The format generation
already fails:
…
(/tmp/mkiitest/tex/texmf/metapost/base/string.mp
(/tmp/mkiitest/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-func.mpii) ) )
(end occurred when else on line 5
On 2013–04–04 Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013–04–04 Hans Hagen wrote:
Indeed, LuajitTeX works, but you broke MkII. The format generation
already fails:
…
(/tmp/mkiitest/tex/texmf/metapost/base/string.mp
(/tmp/mkiitest/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-func.mpii
Hi,
the latest beta throws:
mtx-context | redirect texlua - luajittex: luajittex --luaonly
/tmp/luajitbug/newbeta/tex/texmf-linux-64/bin/mtxrun --script context --jit t
--redirected/tmp/luajitbug/newbeta/tex/texmf-linux-64/bin/mtxrun:15230: attempt
to index field 'searchers' (a nil value
hm I will see asap
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Marco Patzer home...@lavabit.com wrote:
Hi,
the latest beta throws:
mtx-context | redirect texlua - luajittex: luajittex --luaonly
/tmp/luajitbug/newbeta/tex/texmf-linux-64/bin/mtxrun --script context --jit
t --redirected/tmp
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Marco Patzer home...@lavabit.com wrote:
Hi,
the latest beta throws:
mtx-context | redirect texlua - luajittex: luajittex --luaonly
/tmp/luajitbug/newbeta/tex/texmf-linux-64/bin/mtxrun --script context --jit
t --redirected/tmp/luajitbug/newbeta/tex
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:05 PM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Marco Patzer home...@lavabit.com wrote:
Hi,
the latest beta throws:
mtx-context | redirect texlua - luajittex: luajittex --luaonly
/tmp/luajitbug/newbeta/tex/texmf-linux-64/bin
On 2013–04–03 luigi scarso wrote:
Hans is working on a new beta that (among other things)
That's good news.
will fix the issue, in the meanwhile you can try to comment the offending
line .
Not necessary, I'll wait for the new beta.
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 4/3/2013 12:46 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
Hi,
the latest beta throws:
mtx-context | redirect texlua - luajittex: luajittex --luaonly
/tmp/luajitbug/newbeta/tex/texmf-linux-64/bin/mtxrun --script context --jit t
--redirected/tmp/luajitbug/newbeta/tex/texmf-linux-64/bin/mtxrun:15230
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 2:27 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
Hi,
there is a new project on supelec: Luajittex.
Briefly, it's like luatex with Lua replaced by LuaJIT.
See
http://foundry.supelec.fr/gf/project/luajittex/
for the source code.
Please note that LuaJIT is based on lua 5.1, while luatex
Hi,
there is a new project on supelec: Luajittex.
Briefly, it's like luatex with Lua replaced by LuaJIT.
See
http://foundry.supelec.fr/gf/project/luajittex/
for the source code.
Please note that LuaJIT is based on lua 5.1, while luatex is now
based on lua 5.2 --- this means that binaries modules
55 matches
Mail list logo